Discussion
Which one of the following most accurately describes
the argumentative technique employed above?
*This question is included in June 2012 LSAT (PT66): Logical Reasoning A, question #25
| (A) | rejecting a tactic on the grounds that it constitutes an attack on the character of a person and has no substance in fact |
| (B) | ... |
| (C) | ... |
| (D) | ... |
| (E) | ... |
| (F) | ... |
The solution is
Posted: 01/02/2013 23:07
Why is the answer not D?
Posted: 02/01/2013 19:44
It says nothing about this helping consensus be reached (it also says nothing regarding abusiveness). It only points out that 'unyielding' unlike the other two insults, can be proven.