Discussion
The reasoning in the argument above is most vulnerable
to criticism on the grounds that it involves a confusion
between
*This question is included in June 2012 LSAT (PT66): Logical Reasoning A, question #11
| (A) | kinds of things and the things that are of those kinds |
| (B) | ... |
| (C) | ... |
| (D) | ... |
| (E) | ... |
| (F) | ... |
The solution is
Posted: 01/02/2013 21:19
Can someone explain this one? My guess was C...
Posted: 02/01/2013 19:16
It's E because biologists are learning the there are more species than they thought there were. That doesn't mean that there aren't actually fewer than there were due to extinctions. Both realities can coexist, thus the discovery fails to undermine the assumption regarding extinction; and it is unrelated to the claim that pollution is the cause.