Discussion
Which one of the following most closely conforms to the principle illustrated by Evan’s criticism of vegetarians who eat seafood?
*This question is included in Dec 2011 LSAT (PT 65): Logical Reasoning A, question #6
| (A) | I do not know if I have repaid Farah the money she lent me for a movie ticket. She says that she does not remember whether or not I repaid her. In order to be sure that I have repaid her, I will give her the money now. |
| (B) | ... |
| (C) | ... |
| (D) | ... |
| (E) | ... |
| (F) | ... |
The solution is
Posted: 08/02/2012 16:06
Couldn't C also work...
Posted: 08/02/2012 17:10
Dillon, in questions like this, the task is to find one answer that "most closely conforms" or "most closely [verb]...". Therefore, another answer may "work", but it is not the best choice compared to the answer key.
Posted: 08/02/2012 17:14
Actually, in this case, I don't see how C would work. The main premise is that there is a degree of agnosticism (I don't know whether there is a benefit or not, whether it is true or not), but just to be on the safe side, I should do it anyway. C is merely a straight causal argument: because A, we should or should not do B.
Posted: 01/16/2013 21:05
Is it me or is this video not working?
Posted: 01/17/2013 18:47
Jorge, is the video explanation working now? Make sure you have Wifi connection when trying to view the video.