Discussion
Which one of the following most accurately describes a
flaw in the argument above?
*This question is included in Free Complete Section: LR-B, June '07 LSAT, question #23
| (A) | The argument presumes, without providing justification, that if a person’s promise is not selfishly motivated then that promise is reliable. |
| (B) | ... |
| (C) | ... |
| (D) | ... |
| (E) | ... |
| (F) | ... |
The solution is
Posted: 09/30/2011 18:59
Isn't D like a re-wording of A? Sort
Of like the contrapostive...
Of like the contrapostive...
Posted: 10/01/2011 16:26
An explanation of the differences between choices "A" and "D".
If this is helpful, please give us a review on iTunes.
If it's not helpful, let us know and we'll provide you with a more thorough explanation.
Thanks.
If this is helpful, please give us a review on iTunes.
If it's not helpful, let us know and we'll provide you with a more thorough explanation.
Thanks.
Posted: 12/29/2012 00:10
Similarly, D is simply a rewording of B....
Posted: 01/20/2013 02:00
can someone please explain why B is incorrect? It makes sense to me. The author is preuming that because the promise is selfish, it must be unreliable right?
Posted: 05/16/2013 22:53
B goes too far. Never kept is unnecessarily strong. The point at issue is merely unreliability, which need not preclude promises sometimes being kept.