Forgot Password?
 
Links
About Arcadia LSAT Shorthand NotationArcadia Prep's GMAT CourseArcadia Prep's LSAT CourseArcadia Prep's SAT CourseArcadia Prep's GRE CourseThe Simply Brilliant GMAT AppAbout the MCATMCAT Physical and Biological SciencesAbout Arcadia Prep's MCAT CourseTerms of SaleTerms of UseAbout Arcadia Apps
iPhone App Store
GGRE Prep App
GMAT Prep App
LSAT Prep App
LSAT Prep
SAT Prep App
PT 66 S2 Q25
Back to Questions

When a group is unable to reach a consensus, groupmembers are often accused ... ...

Which one of the following most accurately describes the argumentative technique employed above?
(A) rejecting a tactic on the grounds that it constitutes an attack on the character of a person and has no substance in fact
(B) ...
(C) ...
(D) ...
(E) ...

*This question is included in June 2012 LSAT (PT66): Logical Reasoning A

Collapse All Subordinate Threads
Image Not Available
 
Replies to This Thread: 1 | ----
 
Posted: 01/02/2013 23:07
Why is the answer not D?
Image Not Available
Reply 1 of 1
Replies to This Thread: 0 | ----
 
Posted: 02/01/2013 19:44
It says nothing about this helping consensus be reached (it also says nothing regarding abusiveness). It only points out that 'unyielding' unlike the other two insults, can be proven.
Arcadia Prep © 2012.
Contact Arcadia  |  Terms of Use  |  Terms of Sale  |  Change Log-in Info