Forgot Password?
 
Links
About Arcadia LSAT Shorthand NotationArcadia Prep's GMAT CourseArcadia Prep's LSAT CourseArcadia Prep's SAT CourseArcadia Prep's GRE CourseThe Simply Brilliant GMAT AppAbout the MCATMCAT Physical and Biological SciencesAbout Arcadia Prep's MCAT CourseTerms of SaleTerms of UseAbout Arcadia Apps
iPhone App Store
GGRE Prep App
GMAT Prep App
LSAT Prep App
LSAT Prep
SAT Prep App
PT 66 S2 Q7
Back to Questions

Mike: Tom did not tell me that I could use his computer,but it would not ... ...

Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify Mike’s reasoning?
(A) Using the possessions of others without their permission is not always theft.
(B) ...
(C) ...
(D) ...
(E) ...

*This question is included in June 2012 LSAT (PT66): Logical Reasoning A

Collapse All Subordinate Threads
Image Not Available
 
Replies to This Thread: 1 | ----
 
Posted: 01/02/2013 21:09
I got this one right, but can someone explain why C would be incorrect?
Image Not Available
Reply 1 of 1
Replies to This Thread: 0 | ----
 
Posted: 02/02/2013 17:27
If Tom had used Mike's bicycle, rather than Mary's, then it would be.
Arcadia Prep © 2012.
Contact Arcadia  |  Terms of Use  |  Terms of Sale  |  Change Log-in Info