PT 3 S4 Q24
It has been claimed that an action is morally good only if it benefits ... ...
Which one of the following judgments most closely conforms to the principle cited above?
(A) Pamela wrote a letter attempting to cause trouble between Edward and his friend; this action of Pamela's was morally bad, even though the letter, in fact, had an effect directly opposite from the one intended.
(B) ...
(C) ...
(D) ...
(E) ...
*This question is included in
Practice Set: "Illustrating/Identifying Principles" Questions, Set 1 - Illustrating
Contributor
Replies to This Thread: 0
|
----
Posted: 12/01/2011 09:31
I got the answer correct but why is the first one wrong? Is it because Pamela's actions didn't cause the harm she intended?
Contributor
Replies to This Thread: 0
|
----
Posted: 12/01/2011 14:54
Let's diagram:
Good → Benefits another + Perf w/ that intention
Bad → Harms another + (Harm Intended -OR- Forethought would've...)
Now let's look at why (A) is wrong:
Pamela's letter was written with the intent of harming Ed and his friend.
But it had the opposite effect. So it didn't harm Edward or his buddy.
Since one of the necessary criteria for an action to be morally bad is that it DOES harm another, this action is not morally bad.
