PT 58 S4 Q25

Links

About Arcadia LSAT Shorthand Notation Arcadia Prep's GMAT Course Arcadia Prep's LSAT Course Arcadia Prep's SAT Course Arcadia Prep's GRE Course The Simply Brilliant GMAT App About the MCAT MCAT Physical and Biological Sciences About Arcadia Prep's MCAT Course Terms of Sale Terms of Use About Arcadia Apps

LSAT Prep

Back to Questions

Claude: When I'm having lunch with job candidates, Iwatch to see if they ... ...

The two analogies that Larissa offers can most reasonably be interpreted as invoking which one of the following principles to criticize Claude’s policy?
(A) In matters involving personal preference, performing an action without first ascertaining whether it is appropriate in the specific circumstances should not be taken as good evidence of faulty decision making, because the action may be based on a reasoned policy relating to knowledge of a general fact about the circumstances.
(B) ...
(C) ...
(D) ...
(E) ...

*This question is included in Complete Section: LR-B, Sept. '09 LSAT (PT 58 Sec. 4)

Post a new discussion thread

Discussions