Arcadia Prep

Links

About Arcadia LSAT Shorthand Notation Arcadia Prep's GMAT Course Arcadia Prep's LSAT Course Arcadia Prep's SAT Course Arcadia Prep's GRE Course The Simply Brilliant GMAT App About the MCAT MCAT Physical and Biological Sciences About Arcadia Prep's MCAT Course Terms of Sale Terms of Use About Arcadia Apps

LSAT Prep

Back to Questions

If the prosecutor wanted to charge Frank with embezzlement, then Frank ... ...

If the prosecutor wanted to charge Frank with embezzlement, then Frank would already have been indicted. But Frank has not been indicted. So clearly Frank is not an embezzler.

The flawed pattern of reasoning exhibited by which one of the following is most similar to that exhibited by the argument above?

(A) If Rosita knew that her 9:00 appointment would cancel, she would not come in to work until 10:00. She did not come in until 10:00. So she must have known her 9:00 appointment would cancel.
(B) ...
(C) ...
(D) ...
(E) ...

*This question is included in PT71 (Dec 2013): Logical Reasoning A

Post a new discussion thread

Discussions