Lawyer: If you take something that you have good reason to think is someone ... ...

Lawyer: If you take something that you have good reason to think is someone else’s property, that is stealing, and stealing is wrong. However, Meyers had no good reason to think that the compost in the public garden was anyone else’s property, so it was not wrong for Meyers to take it.

The reasoning in the lawyer’s argument is flawed in that the argument


(A)  confuses a factual claim with a moral judgment 

(B) ...
(C) ...
(D) ...
(E) ...

*This question is included in PT71 (Dec 2013): Logical Reasoning A