Arcadia Prep

Links

About Arcadia LSAT Shorthand Notation Arcadia Prep's GMAT Course Arcadia Prep's LSAT Course Arcadia Prep's SAT Course Arcadia Prep's GRE Course The Simply Brilliant GMAT App About the MCAT MCAT Physical and Biological Sciences About Arcadia Prep's MCAT Course Terms of Sale Terms of Use About Arcadia Apps

LSAT Prep

Back to Questions

Ethicist: Robert Gillette has argued that because a thorough knowledge ... ...

Ethicist: Robert Gillette has argued that because a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure the over 3,000 inherited disorders that affect humanity, deciphering the human genetic code will certainly benefit humanity despite its enormous cost. Gillette’s argument is not persuasive, however, because he fails to consider that such knowledge might ultimately harm human beings more than it would benefit them.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the ethicist’s argument?

(A) Gillette’s argument wrongly assumes that deciphering the genetic code will lead to cures for genetic disorders.  
(B) ...
(C) ...
(D) ...
(E) ...

*This question is included in PT71 (Dec 2013): Logical Reasoning A

Post a new discussion thread

Discussions